Embedded Files
Class 11 NCERT Solutions eNGLISH
Class 11 NCERT Solutions eNGLISH
Woven Words essay Chapter 3
Woven Words essay Chapter 3
Patterns of Creativity
UNDERSTANDING THE TEXT
1. How does Shelley’s attitude to science differ from that of Wordsworth and Keats?
20 words
Shelley admired science deeply, unlike Wordsworth and Keats, who saw it as harming nature's beauty and poetic imagination.
40 words
While Wordsworth and Keats criticized science for killing nature’s beauty, Shelley embraced it. He celebrated science in his poetry, blending imagination with scientific facts, showing how both could work together rather than being in conflict.
60 words
Shelley saw science as a source of joy and inspiration, using it creatively in his poetry. Unlike Wordsworth and Keats, who believed science ruined nature’s beauty and poetic feelings, Shelley blended science with imagination. He believed science expanded the mind’s reach and beautifully expressed its wonders, showing a more balanced and respectful view.
80 words
Unlike Wordsworth and Keats, who saw science as a cold force that destroyed nature’s beauty, Shelley celebrated science in his poetry. He believed it brought joy, peace, and understanding. Shelley’s works, like The Cloud and Prometheus Unbound, beautifully combine scientific facts with poetic imagination. He saw science and poetry as partners, both helping humans grow intellectually and spiritually. His attitude reflected a modern, open-minded perspective that embraced science without losing emotional or artistic depth.
---
2. How does Desmond King-Hele’s criticism of Shelley show a meeting point of poetry and science?
20 words
Desmond King-Hele, a scientist, praised Shelley’s poetry for its scientific detail, showing how poetry and science can connect.
40 words
King-Hele admired Shelley’s deep understanding of scientific ideas, showing that poets can express scientific thoughts beautifully. His praise proves that science and poetry can work together, not against each other, and that both enrich human understanding in unique ways.
60 words
Desmond King-Hele, a scientist, offered deep literary criticism of Shelley, praising how his poetry contained scientific knowledge. This shows that science and poetry can overlap meaningfully. Shelley used precise scientific details in his poems, proving that poetic expression and scientific thought can support and inspire one another, creating a bridge between emotion and intellect.
80 words
Desmond King-Hele, a well-known scientist, appreciated the way Shelley expressed scientific ideas through his poetry. He highlighted how Shelley’s works like The Cloud beautifully integrated natural science with imagination. This appreciation shows a strong meeting point between poetry and science, proving that both can coexist and enrich each other. King-Hele’s views reveal that Shelley’s poetry was not just emotional but intellectually stimulating too, merging the accuracy of science with the beauty of art.
---
3. What do you infer from Darwin’s comment on his indifference to literature as he advanced in years?
20 words
Darwin lost interest in literature and the arts with age, showing science may weaken emotional and artistic sensitivity over time.
40 words
Darwin’s words suggest that intense focus on scientific thinking made him emotionally distant from poetry, music, and art. This implies that a scientific mindset, if not balanced, might dull one’s appreciation for creativity and emotional beauty in life.
60 words
Darwin’s comment reveals that as he became more focused on science, he lost his earlier love for literature, poetry, music, and art. This suggests that scientific thinking, when dominating the mind, may suppress emotional sensitivity. It highlights the risk of emotional atrophy and reminds us that creativity and emotion need nurturing alongside rational thought.
80 words
Charles Darwin expressed that his deep focus on science led him to lose interest in poetry, music, and visual arts, which once brought him great joy. This suggests that excessive focus on analytical and logical thinking can numb emotional and imaginative faculties. His experience reflects a possible danger in allowing scientific reasoning to overpower creativity and emotional appreciation. It shows the importance of maintaining a balance between scientific exploration and artistic or literary enjoyment to keep the human spirit complete.
---
4. How do the patterns of creativity displayed by scientists differ from those displayed by poets?
20 words
Scientists create through logic and experiments; poets use imagination and emotion. Their creativity follows different patterns but aims at discovery.
40 words
Scientists rely on observation, analysis, and facts to create, while poets use imagination, emotions, and symbolic language. Their creative processes differ in method and purpose, but both aim to explore truth—science through logic, and poetry through feeling.
60 words
The creativity of scientists follows structured processes—experiments, logic, and data analysis—while poets use intuition, feelings, and imagination. Scientists discover truths of the physical world, and poets express emotional truths. Though their patterns differ, both seek knowledge, beauty, and meaning. Their creativity complements each other—science explains life’s workings, while poetry explores its deeper emotional and spiritual dimensions.
80 words
Scientists and poets show creativity in different but meaningful ways. Scientists follow logic, experiments, and observations to explain natural phenomena, while poets use imagination, emotion, and artistic language to express the human experience. Scientific creativity is often precise and measurable, whereas poetic creativity is emotional and interpretative. Despite these differences, both forms aim to understand and express life. Together, they offer a fuller picture of the world—one rooted in reason, the other in emotional truth and beauty.
---
5. What is the central argument of the speaker?
20 words
The speaker argues that creativity in science and poetry differs but both are valuable and should not oppose each other.
40 words
The speaker’s main idea is that while science and poetry use different creative paths, both are essential. He argues that dismissing one for the other limits human understanding. Instead, he urges mutual respect and balance between imagination and intellect.
60 words
The central argument is that creativity in science and poetry follows different patterns but both are crucial for a complete understanding of life. The speaker believes these two fields are often wrongly seen as rivals. He uses examples like Shelley, Darwin, and Faraday to show how imagination, intellect, and beauty can and should coexist in human thought and progress.
80 words
The speaker’s central argument is that science and poetry reflect different but equally important forms of creativity. He criticizes the division between them, showing that true understanding comes from appreciating both intellectual reasoning and emotional imagination. Using examples from Shelley, Darwin, Faraday, and others, the speaker emphasizes that science and poetry are not enemies. Instead, they are different expressions of the human quest for truth, beauty, and meaning. The speaker calls for a unified view that honors both art and science.
TALKING ABOUT THE TEXT
1. ‘Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world’.
20 words
This means poets shape thoughts and values silently. They influence society deeply, even if they aren't officially recognised like leaders.
40 words
The phrase means poets quietly shape people’s minds and social values through their writings. Their emotional and philosophical insights often guide humanity’s thinking more than laws or politics. Though they lack power, their words create lasting influence on society and culture.
60 words
When Shelley says poets are "unacknowledged legislators," he means they influence human thinking and values in silent but powerful ways. Poets bring out emotions, ideas, and truths that often remain unnoticed by ordinary logic. Through poetry, they guide society’s inner voice and shape its soul, even if they don’t hold political power or formal authority.
80 words
Shelley’s line means poets have a deep, lasting influence on society by shaping emotions, values, and ideas. Though not in government or law-making positions, their poetry awakens thoughts and feelings that change the way people think and live. Poets express truths others cannot, often inspiring change, peace, or rebellion. Their impact is invisible but strong—making them the silent force behind social progress and human evolution. In this way, they guide the world without official recognition.
---
2. Poetry and science are incompatible.
20 words
This view claims poetry and science conflict, but they actually reveal different truths—science uses logic, poetry uses emotion.
40 words
While some say poetry and science can’t coexist, this isn’t fully true. Science explores physical truths, while poetry explores emotional and spiritual truths. They use different methods but can support and inspire each other to understand the world more completely.
60 words
People often believe poetry and science are opposites—science is logical and factual, while poetry is emotional and imaginative. But this view is limited. Poetry can bring beauty to scientific ideas, and science can offer structure to poetic thought. Together, they create a fuller understanding of life by blending reason with feeling, facts with imagination.
80 words
Poetry and science are often thought to be incompatible because they follow different paths—science uses logic, data, and experiments, while poetry uses feelings, symbols, and imagination. However, this difference doesn’t mean they can’t work together. Science explains how the world works, and poetry explains how we feel about it. When combined, they give us a deeper, richer understanding of life. Both are essential for human growth—science for knowledge and poetry for meaning and beauty.
---
3. ‘On reading Shelley’s A Defence of Poetry, the question insistently occurs why there is no similar A Defence of Science written by a scientist of equal endowment.’
20 words
This reflects the lack of a passionate and poetic defence of science, equal in depth to Shelley’s defence of poetry.
40 words
Shelley beautifully defends poetry’s value in his essay, but there is no equally moving defence of science by any scientist. This shows how few scientists express their field with the same passion and poetic insight that Shelley used for defending poetry.
60 words
Shelley’s A Defence of Poetry passionately explains why poetry matters. The author wonders why science hasn’t been defended in a similarly poetic and powerful way. It may be because most scientists focus on facts, not emotions. This lack of a creative, heartfelt defence of science shows the gap between how poetry and science are understood and appreciated by the public.
80 words
The speaker points out that while Shelley’s A Defence of Poetry emotionally and intellectually champions poetry, science lacks a similarly inspiring defence by a scientist of equal creativity. This gap raises the question—why hasn’t a scientist expressed science’s value in such a poetic and passionate way? Perhaps science is usually described through facts, not feelings. Yet, this absence highlights the need for scientists to also show the emotional and philosophical beauty behind their discoveries, as poets do.
APPRECIATION
1. How does the ‘assortment of remarks’ compiled by the author give us an understanding of the ways of science and poetry?
20 words
The author uses various quotes and examples to show how science and poetry follow different paths but aim for truth.
40 words
By sharing quotes from poets, scientists, and philosophers, the author shows how science and poetry differ in approach but both seek meaning. These remarks help us understand that creativity can exist in both logic and emotion, forming a balanced human understanding.
60 words
The author’s assortment of remarks compares views from Shelley, Keats, Darwin, Faraday, and others. This collection shows the unique ways science and poetry work—one logical, the other emotional. It helps us see that both follow different creative patterns yet aim to explain the world. This thoughtful collection highlights how imagination and reason can coexist and enrich each other.
80 words
The author gathers opinions and experiences from famous poets and scientists like Shelley, Keats, Darwin, Faraday, and Maxwell. These remarks show how poetry uses imagination and emotion, while science relies on logic and facts. By placing these views side by side, the author helps us appreciate both approaches to creativity. The collection emphasizes that although their methods are different, science and poetry both seek to understand and beautify the world. This broad perspective deepens our understanding of human knowledge and expression.
---
2. Considering that this is an excerpt from a lecture, how does the commentary provided by the speaker string the arguments together?
20 words
The speaker connects different ideas smoothly, using examples and reflections that link poetry and science into a flowing, thoughtful discussion.
40 words
Since this is a lecture, the speaker uses a conversational tone to link ideas. He discusses poets, scientists, and their views clearly, allowing the audience to follow his reasoning. The examples help string the arguments together into one meaningful, connected thought.
60 words
As a lecture, the speaker’s tone is reflective and engaging. He introduces quotes and examples in a flowing style, tying together thoughts about creativity in science and poetry. Each argument builds upon the last. His use of real-life cases, like Darwin’s confession and Shelley’s poetry, makes the lecture feel unified and relatable, helping listeners understand the contrast and connection between both fields.
80 words
The speaker presents his arguments in a lecture style by using personal commentary, literary quotes, and scientific examples. Each section smoothly transitions into the next, forming a logical and emotional flow. He uses Shelley’s praise of science, Darwin’s regret, and Faraday’s innovations to explain the creative patterns in poetry and science. This storytelling approach ties the points together, giving the lecture both depth and clarity. His reflections help the audience grasp the broader message without feeling overwhelmed or lost.
---
3. The Cloud ‘fuses together a creative myth, a scientific monograph, and a gay picaresque tale of cloud adventure’—explain.
20 words
Shelley’s The Cloud blends myth, science, and fun storytelling. It presents natural facts in a poetic and playful way.
40 words
The Cloud combines three styles: myth (personifying the cloud), science (natural facts about weather), and adventure (the cloud’s journey). Shelley creatively mixes fact and fiction, showing how science and poetry can work together to create beauty and knowledge.
60 words
Shelley’s poem The Cloud is a beautiful mix of scientific fact, mythic imagination, and joyful storytelling. It presents the cloud as a living being, shares facts about weather processes, and gives it an adventurous personality. This creative fusion shows how poetry can explain science with charm, making natural phenomena feel both real and magical for readers.
80 words
In The Cloud, Shelley turns a natural object into a magical character. He blends scientific details about evaporation, rain, and sunlight with a mythic voice, calling the cloud a "daughter of Earth and Water." The cloud travels, laughs, dies, and is reborn—creating a lively, adventurous tale. This fusion of myth, science, and fun storytelling transforms a common weather cycle into something poetic and engaging. Shelley shows that science can inspire wonder, and poetry can express it in a creative way.
LANGUAGE WORK
1. How do the words in bold, in the lines below, illustrate the poet’s ability to convey criticism cryptically?
Lines:
> Our meddling intellect
Misshapes the beauteous forms of things:
We murder to dissect.
20 words
The poet subtly criticizes science, showing that deep analysis destroys nature’s beauty. His choice of words conveys this smartly.
40 words
These bold words express deep criticism without direct blame. The poet suggests that intellectual analysis interferes with nature’s beauty. Words like meddling and murder sharply show how science, in trying to understand nature, may unintentionally harm its natural charm.
60 words
In these lines, Wordsworth uses strong, indirect criticism to show how science harms natural beauty. Meddling intellect suggests unwanted interference, and murder to dissect means scientists destroy something beautiful just to study it. The poet uses poetic words to express how cold reasoning takes away the charm and mystery of nature, without openly attacking science directly.
80 words
The bold words reflect the poet’s skill in expressing powerful criticism through poetic imagery. Meddling intellect shows how scientific reasoning disrupts nature’s purity. Misshapes the beauteous forms means that by trying to explain beauty, we often ruin it. We murder to dissect powerfully implies that studying something too closely can destroy its essence. This is a hidden criticism of scientific over-analysis, skillfully delivered through metaphor and tone, showing how poetry can challenge ideas in a subtle yet sharp way.
---
2. Explain the contradiction in the similes, ‘Like a child from the womb, like a ghost from the tomb’.
20 words
One simile shows birth and life, the other shows death. Together, they contrast renewal and loss in a single moment.
40 words
The similes compare the cloud to both a newborn child and a ghost. A child symbolizes life and beginning, while a ghost represents death and the past. The contradiction shows how the cloud is both ending and starting again—a symbol of nature’s cycle.
60 words
These similes show opposing ideas—a child from the womb suggests new life and birth, while a ghost from the tomb suggests death and the past. Shelley uses this contradiction to show how the cloud dies and rises again. It reflects the cycle of nature where endings and beginnings happen together, blending beauty, mystery, and rebirth.
80 words
The two similes—like a child from the womb and like a ghost from the tomb—express opposite ideas: one of life and one of death. Shelley uses this contradiction to show how the cloud constantly transforms. It dies, yet it is reborn. Nature, like the cloud, moves in cycles—death gives way to life. This dual imagery beautifully represents the mystery and magic of natural processes. It shows that in poetry, even opposites can blend to reveal deeper truths.
---
3. Explain the metaphor in the line: ‘Poets are ... the mirrors of gigantic shadows that futurity casts on the present’.
20 words
This metaphor means poets reflect future ideas in the present. They sense upcoming changes before others can see them clearly.
40 words
The poet is called a mirror reflecting “gigantic shadows” from the future. This means poets sense and express deep truths that will later shape society. They can foresee what others cannot, giving insight into things yet to come.
60 words
This metaphor shows that poets reflect the future before it arrives. Gigantic shadows stand for future ideas and changes, while poets are mirrors that reflect them in today’s world. Shelley suggests that poets don’t just write about the present—they unknowingly express visions and emotions that hint at what the world will become.
80 words
The metaphor means poets reflect the future’s truths in the present moment. Gigantic shadows represent big ideas or changes that are yet to fully appear. Poets, as mirrors, unknowingly capture these ideas in their work, giving people a glimpse into what’s coming. Shelley believes that poets don’t just describe their time—they’re inspired by forces beyond them and become messengers of future emotions, thoughts, and revolutions. Their work speaks before others even understand the message.
EXTRA QUESTIONS
1. Why does the author quote Shelley frequently in the essay?
20 words
Shelley balanced science and poetry. The author uses him to show that creativity can exist in both intellect and imagination.
40 words
The author quotes Shelley to highlight how poetry and science can support each other. Shelley loved science and used it in his poetry. His work proves that imagination and knowledge can come together to create beauty and understanding.
60 words
The author quotes Shelley to support his belief that science and poetry are not enemies. Shelley’s poetry often includes scientific facts, and he respected scientific discovery. By using Shelley’s views and lines, the author proves that great poets can appreciate science and merge it with creativity. Shelley’s balanced view strengthens the central message of harmony between emotion and reason.
80 words
The author uses Shelley’s quotes and views to show that poetry and science can exist in harmony. Unlike other Romantic poets like Keats or Wordsworth who feared science would ruin beauty, Shelley embraced it. He turned scientific ideas into poetic expressions. His work reflects both intellectual depth and emotional richness. Through Shelley, the author shows that the finest creativity often blends reason with imagination, proving that poetry and science can work together in expanding human understanding and wonder.
---
2. What lesson can we learn from Darwin’s confession?
20 words
Darwin’s words show that focusing only on science may reduce emotional sensitivity and the ability to enjoy beauty and art.
40 words
Darwin confessed that he lost interest in poetry and art over time. This teaches us that emotional and artistic sides also need nurturing. Pure scientific reasoning, if not balanced with imagination, might cause us to lose joy in creative expressions.
60 words
Darwin’s confession reveals a loss of emotional connection due to extreme focus on logic and science. Once a lover of literature, he later found poetry dull. This teaches us that a balanced life must include both intellect and emotion. Focusing only on logic may weaken our appreciation for beauty, creativity, and deeper human experiences that poetry and art bring.
80 words
Darwin’s personal confession reflects the emotional cost of living only through logic and scientific analysis. He once enjoyed poetry, music, and paintings but later found them boring and unbearable. This change suggests that an overworked scientific mind can lose touch with feelings and artistic joy. It warns us about the risk of neglecting our emotional and creative side. We learn that true fulfilment comes from nurturing both reason and imagination, not just knowledge but also feeling and beauty.
---
3. How is Shelley’s poem The Cloud an example of scientific poetry?
20 words
The Cloud combines weather facts with poetic beauty. Shelley personifies the cloud while using real scientific processes creatively.
40 words
In The Cloud, Shelley blends science and poetry. He describes natural events like evaporation and rain with imagination, turning them into a living story. The poem teaches science but also entertains, showing how both fields can come together beautifully.
60 words
Shelley’s The Cloud creatively mixes scientific facts with poetic expression. He describes how clouds form, rain falls, and skies clear using beautiful imagery. The cloud is personified, giving it emotions and life. This poem teaches us that science can inspire imagination, and poetry can explain natural processes in a magical, memorable way. It is a great example of science as art.
80 words
The Cloud by Shelley is a perfect example of how science and poetry can work together. He uses poetic language to describe real natural processes like condensation, rain, and sunlight. The cloud speaks as a character, sharing its journey in a fun, imaginative way. Shelley’s deep knowledge of nature helps him present science through art. His poem shows that scientific facts can be transformed into beautiful and creative expressions without losing their truth. It makes science enjoyable and poetic.
---
4. Why does the author mention Faraday’s response to Gladstone?
20 words
Faraday’s witty reply shows how science, even when abstract, has practical value. It highlights the visionary nature of scientific work.
40 words
The author uses Faraday’s clever reply to show that great scientists can foresee the future value of their work. When Gladstone questioned the usefulness of electricity, Faraday predicted its economic impact, proving how science may appear abstract but benefits humanity.
60 words
Faraday’s response to Gladstone reflects the importance of visionary thinking in science. Although electricity seemed useless at the time, Faraday confidently said it would soon be taxable. The author uses this example to highlight how scientists think beyond immediate benefits. Their creativity often leads to long-term, world-changing results. It reinforces the idea that science’s beauty also lies in future possibilities.
80 words
Faraday’s famous response to Gladstone—“You will soon be able to tax it”—shows the forward-thinking mindset of scientists. At the time, electricity wasn’t yet useful to the common man, but Faraday knew it would transform society. The author uses this to show how scientific creativity often goes unappreciated in the moment, yet it holds great value for the future. This moment also reflects how science, like poetry, requires imagination and vision, not just facts and formulas.
---
5. Why is Shelley called a ‘scientist’s poet’?
20 words
Shelley loved science and used it in his poetry. Scientists admired him for blending science with emotional beauty.
40 words
Shelley is called a scientist’s poet because he admired science and used it creatively in his poems. Unlike other poets, he saw beauty in scientific discovery. Scientists like Desmond King-Hele praised his work for its accurate and inspiring use of science.
60 words
Shelley earned the title “scientist’s poet” because he deeply respected science and included scientific ideas in his poetry. His poem The Cloud shows weather science beautifully. Scientists admire him because he made complex facts emotional and artistic. He used poetry to celebrate logic, nature, and the unknown, proving that science and imagination can live together in harmony.
80 words
Shelley is called a “scientist’s poet” because he embraced science instead of fearing it. His poetry often included scientific observations and ideas, expressed in beautiful language. Unlike poets like Keats and Wordsworth, Shelley believed that science enhanced beauty and wonder. Scientists, including Desmond King-Hele, appreciated how Shelley’s works explained natural phenomena while stirring emotions. His ability to bring science into the poetic world made him a rare figure who united imagination with intellect, reason with emotion, and fact with feeling.
6. How does the author view the conflict between science and literature?
20 words
The author believes the conflict is unnecessary. He feels science and literature should support each other, not compete or clash.
40 words
According to the author, science and literature are wrongly seen as enemies. He argues they both aim to understand life—one through facts, the other through feelings. Instead of fighting, they should cooperate and enrich each other for complete human progress.
60 words
The author disagrees with the idea that science and literature are in conflict. He believes both explore truth in their own ways—science with logic and literature with emotion. He feels the rivalry is man-made and unnecessary. By sharing examples like Shelley’s poetry and Darwin’s loss of sensitivity, the author shows how both fields should be respected and balanced.
80 words
The author views the supposed conflict between science and literature as misleading and avoidable. He argues that both seek to understand the world—science through facts, experiments, and theories, and literature through imagination, emotions, and storytelling. Instead of competing, they can complement each other. The essay uses Shelley’s poetic science and Darwin’s emotional decline to suggest that excluding either limits human understanding. The author calls for harmony between the two, believing this balance leads to richer creativity and deeper insight.
---
7. What does the essay say about Maxwell’s view of Faraday’s work?
20 words
Maxwell admired Faraday’s ideas, calling him a great mathematician. He believed Faraday’s concepts would shape future scientific thinking.
40 words
Maxwell praised Faraday’s creativity in using concepts like lines of force. Though Faraday wasn’t formally trained in mathematics, Maxwell saw his work as visionary. He predicted that Faraday’s ideas would inspire future scientific developments and possibly even new branches of science.
60 words
Maxwell held Faraday’s work in high regard. He appreciated how Faraday used imagination to explain electromagnetic induction using ‘lines of force’. Though Faraday lacked formal mathematical training, Maxwell saw him as a pioneer whose ideas were ahead of his time. He believed that Faraday’s thinking would lay the foundation for future scientific methods and new discoveries.
80 words
The essay quotes Maxwell’s admiration for Faraday’s creativity and vision. Faraday introduced the idea of 'lines of force' in electromagnetism, which many contemporaries didn’t understand or accept. Maxwell, however, recognized Faraday’s brilliance and called him a mathematician of the highest order. He even said future scientists might develop entire new fields based on Faraday’s insights. This shows how scientific creativity, like poetry, requires imagination and faith in new ideas—qualities that make Faraday’s work timeless and influential.
---
8. What does Shelley say about the internal and external worlds in science?
20 words
Shelley believed science expanded control over the external world but ignored the inner world of emotions and imagination.
40 words
Shelley said science helped man control nature but weakened his inner life. Without poetic imagination, science can make humans slaves to logic. He believed inner growth—feelings, creativity, and spirit—was equally important and should not be ignored in scientific progress.
60 words
Shelley believed science had enlarged man’s control over the outer world—machines, elements, and tools. But he also warned that without imagination and poetry, this progress shrinks the internal world of emotions and higher thoughts. He felt that the soul, spirit, and creativity are equally important. Thus, poetry was necessary to balance science and help humans stay emotionally and spiritually free.
80 words
Shelley argued that science had successfully given man power over the external world, like controlling machines, nature, and matter. However, without poetry and imagination, man’s inner world—emotions, thoughts, and creativity—was suffering. He feared that science without the poetic faculty would make humans emotionally empty and spiritually limited. Shelley believed poetry adds meaning, purpose, and beauty to life. So, for a complete life, both the inner emotional world and the outer scientific world must grow together.
---
9. Why does the author refer to A Defence of Poetry as a profound document?
20 words
The author praises A Defence of Poetry for deeply expressing poetry’s value. He sees it as powerful, emotional, and timeless.
40 words
The author finds A Defence of Poetry profound because it explains how poetry captures truth, beauty, and inspiration. Shelley’s passionate language and deep understanding make it one of literature’s most moving defenses of creativity and imagination, still relevant today.
60 words
The author calls A Defence of Poetry a profound essay because Shelley beautifully explains poetry’s role in shaping human emotions, ideas, and even society. It expresses how poetry captures what science can’t—dreams, inspiration, and beauty. Shelley’s insights move beyond mere emotion and show poetry’s power to influence minds and hearts. That’s why Yeats called it the greatest essay on poetry’s foundation.
80 words
The Defence of Poetry is described as profound because Shelley doesn’t just praise poetry—he explains its deeper purpose. He says poetry captures the best human thoughts, emotions, and dreams. It connects all knowledge and inspires society without being forceful. Shelley’s ideas show that poetry shapes the world’s values and imagination. The author admires the essay for its spiritual depth and timeless relevance. Its emotional, intellectual, and philosophical richness makes it one of literature’s most powerful defences of artistic expression.
---
10. How does the essay help us understand the meaning of creativity?
20 words
The essay shows that creativity is not limited to art. It exists in science, poetry, and all deep human thinking.
40 words
This essay proves that creativity means using imagination to explore truth. Whether through poetry or science, creativity helps us discover new ideas. It’s about curiosity, passion, and vision—not just beauty, but insight into how the world works and feels.
60 words
Creativity, as described in the essay, goes beyond artistic expression. It lives in both scientists and poets. Scientists imagine theories, while poets express feelings. The essay shows that both use creative thinking—one through facts, the other through emotions. By comparing Shelley’s poetry and Faraday’s science, the author reveals that creativity is the ability to see connections, explore the unknown, and express deep truths.
80 words
The essay explains that creativity is not only about writing poems or painting—it also exists in science. Scientists like Faraday and Maxwell were creative in their thinking, just like poets like Shelley. Creativity means thinking beyond the obvious, connecting different ideas, and imagining new possibilities. It’s what drives both scientific discoveries and poetic expressions. The essay shows that creativity is the heart of both emotion and intellect, helping humanity grow in knowledge, beauty, and purpose.
11. What is the significance of the quote "We murder to dissect"?
20 words
It means scientific analysis can destroy natural beauty. In trying to understand everything, we may lose emotional and poetic value.
40 words
The quote criticizes how science sometimes harms what it studies. Wordsworth believed that breaking things down logically takes away their beauty. He feared that science, in explaining nature, ends up destroying the magic and emotional connection we feel toward it.
60 words
“We murder to dissect” means that the scientific urge to analyze and explain can spoil the natural charm of things. Wordsworth felt that science’s logical mind breaks down nature into parts and loses sight of its wonder. He feared that this kind of dissection ruins the emotional connection we have with the world, turning beauty into something cold and technical.
80 words
Wordsworth’s quote “We murder to dissect” highlights his belief that science, in trying to explain nature, kills its beauty and mystery. He felt that when we dissect nature to understand it logically, we often lose the feelings, awe, and emotions it inspires. The poet criticizes this ‘cold philosophy’ that values facts over feelings. This quote shows the poet’s concern that too much analysis removes the joy of simply experiencing nature, making science seem destructive to natural beauty.
---
12. How does the author show mutual respect between poetry and science?
20 words
The author shares examples like Shelley’s poetic science and Faraday’s imagination, showing that poetry and science can respect each other.
40 words
By quoting Shelley, Faraday, and Maxwell, the author shows that poetry and science are not enemies. Poets can value science, and scientists can use imagination. These examples prove that mutual respect is possible and beneficial to both fields.
60 words
The author shows mutual respect between poetry and science by highlighting Shelley’s admiration for scientific thought and Maxwell’s appreciation of Faraday’s imagination. These cases prove that poets can celebrate science, and scientists can value creative thinking. The essay uses such examples to bridge the gap, encouraging both sides to learn from each other and grow together.
80 words
The author argues that poetry and science can respect and enhance each other. He shows this through Shelley, who combined poetic beauty with scientific precision, and through Maxwell, who praised Faraday’s imaginative science. These examples reveal that scientists can appreciate beauty and creativity, while poets can value facts and discovery. The author uses these stories to promote harmony between the two, suggesting that both fields enrich human understanding when they work together instead of opposing each other.
---
13. What does the author suggest by quoting Darwin’s loss of poetic interest?
20 words
He shows that focusing only on science can dull emotional sensitivity. Darwin’s case warns against neglecting artistic imagination.
40 words
The author uses Darwin’s regret to show how intense focus on scientific reasoning may lead to losing emotional depth. Darwin once loved poetry and music, but later found them dull. This loss shows the danger of ignoring creative, artistic aspects of life.
60 words
By quoting Darwin’s loss of interest in poetry and art, the author warns that too much focus on logic can harm emotional and creative faculties. Darwin admitted that science turned his mind into a machine for facts, making him unable to enjoy beauty. The author uses this to stress the importance of balancing intellect with imagination to stay emotionally alive.
80 words
Darwin’s confession that he lost interest in poetry and music as he aged reflects a serious emotional decline. The author includes this to show that while science gives knowledge, it can also cause a loss of joy and sensitivity if not balanced. Darwin’s words serve as a reminder that creativity and emotion must be nurtured alongside logic. Ignoring poetry and art can limit one’s humanity, making us efficient but emotionally empty. The author uses this to highlight the need for emotional balance.
---
14. Why does the author say poets express “what they understand not”?
20 words
Poets often feel inspired by deep truths they can’t fully explain. Their words come from intuition, not just understanding.
40 words
The author means poets express feelings and insights that they may not logically understand. Poetry comes from inspiration and emotion, often ahead of clear reasoning. Poets become channels of truths that are sensed deeply but not always intellectually explained.
60 words
When the author says poets “express what they understand not,” he means poets are inspired by a force beyond logic. They write truths that touch the soul, not always the brain. Their words reflect future emotions, dreams, or truths that even they don’t fully grasp. Poetry comes from intuition, making poets messengers of feelings and visions beyond clear explanation.
80 words
The author believes that poets, in moments of inspiration, become vessels for deeper truths. They often write powerful lines filled with emotion, beauty, or foresight, even though they may not completely understand their own words. This makes poetry magical and mysterious. Poets don’t always rely on logic but trust their inner voice and intuition. Their role is to reflect feelings, ideas, and visions that are difficult to define but deeply felt—making them guides of human emotion and thought.
---
15. How does the essay reflect on future possibilities in science and poetry?
20 words
The essay shows both fields as forward-looking. Poetry imagines future feelings, and science lays foundations for future discoveries.
40 words
The author believes poetry and science help shape the future. Poets predict emotions and social change, while scientists imagine new theories. Both fields plant seeds today that grow into ideas, inventions, or emotions tomorrow. Creativity always looks forward.
60 words
Science and poetry, though different, both explore what lies ahead. The essay highlights that poets, like Shelley, express emotions and visions that belong to the future. Similarly, scientists like Faraday develop ideas that later change the world. Creativity in both fields involves seeing beyond the present, imagining what is possible, and inspiring others. This forward-thinking nature makes them powerful tools of progress.
80 words
The essay highlights how both science and poetry shape the future in their unique ways. Poets sense emotions and ideas that will become important later—casting shadows of the future onto the present. Scientists, like Faraday and Maxwell, create theories that may not be useful immediately but transform the world later. The author shows that creativity is not just about the present—it is a force that leads humanity forward. Through imagination and insight, poetry and science both build the world of tomorrow.
16. What role does imagination play in scientific creativity?
20 words
Imagination helps scientists create new ideas. It allows them to think beyond facts and explore unknown possibilities like poets do.
40 words
Scientific creativity depends on imagination just like poetry. Faraday imagined ‘lines of force’ and revolutionized science. Without imagination, discoveries are limited. Scientists use creative thinking to form theories, visualize outcomes, and solve problems that logic alone cannot handle.
60 words
Imagination is essential in science, as it helps in thinking beyond what already exists. Faraday imagined invisible forces, and Maxwell developed those ideas into major theories. Such imagination gives birth to new scientific fields. Without it, science would become mechanical. Creative vision helps scientists connect dots, predict results, and inspire new technologies, making imagination a core part of scientific creativity.
80 words
Imagination in science allows great thinkers to go beyond facts and formulas. It lets them visualize things that can’t be seen, like forces or particles. Faraday imagined magnetic lines of force; Maxwell built on that idea and changed physics forever. This proves that imagination is as important in science as in poetry. Without it, science would just collect data without understanding or innovation. Imagination helps scientists take bold steps into the unknown, opening doors to discovery and invention.
---
17. What does the author mean by “cold philosophy”?
20 words
"Cold philosophy" refers to science that ignores emotions or beauty. It explains everything logically but forgets the wonder of life.
40 words
The phrase “cold philosophy” criticizes scientific thinking that focuses only on logic and facts. It suggests that when science removes mystery and emotion from nature, it becomes lifeless. The author highlights how such thinking can miss the beauty of existence.
60 words
“Cold philosophy” refers to the kind of science that strips nature of its charm and turns everything into facts. Poets like Keats believed that explaining rainbows or stars through formulas ruined their magic. The author uses this term to reflect how science, when practiced without emotion or imagination, can become dull and disconnected from the human experience.
80 words
The author uses the term “cold philosophy” to express how scientific analysis, when done without emotion or imagination, can make the world feel lifeless. Keats and other poets felt that science reduced the beauty of nature by explaining it in dry terms. The rainbow was no longer magical—it became just light refraction. The phrase reminds us that facts alone can’t capture the wonder of life. Science needs to respect the emotional and poetic side of reality to feel complete.
---
18. Why does the author admire Shelley’s fusion of myth and science?
20 words
Shelley blended myth and science beautifully, showing facts through imagination. The author admires how Shelley united emotion and logic.
40 words
The author appreciates Shelley’s ability to turn scientific concepts into poetic stories. By mixing myth and fact, Shelley made science emotional and enjoyable. This rare blend shows that science doesn’t need to be dry—it can be artistic and meaningful too.
60 words
Shelley’s poems, like The Cloud, show how myth and science can merge without losing beauty or truth. He explains natural processes through poetic imagination, making science feel alive. The author admires this blend because it brings out the emotional depth of science, proving that logic and creativity can exist together in one expression. Shelley’s poetic science makes facts magical.
80 words
The author greatly admires Shelley’s ability to blend scientific knowledge with mythical storytelling. In poems like The Cloud, Shelley combines weather science with imaginative, playful language. This approach turns scientific facts into something meaningful and beautiful. The author respects how Shelley proves that science doesn’t have to be dry or boring—it can be full of wonder. His writing celebrates the unity of reason and emotion, showing how myth and science together create a deeper, richer experience of nature.
---
19. How does the essay show the timeless value of creativity?
20 words
The essay shows creativity is eternal. Whether in poetry or science, it shapes thoughts, solves problems, and inspires generations.
40 words
Creativity, as shown in this essay, lasts forever. Shelley’s poetry still inspires, and Faraday’s ideas still guide science. True creativity goes beyond time—it creates lasting impact. The author shows how both poets and scientists leave a legacy through imagination.
60 words
This essay reveals that creativity—whether poetic or scientific—never fades. Shelley’s imaginative poetry and Faraday’s visionary science continue to influence the world. The author stresses that genuine creativity looks beyond the present and leaves a timeless impact. It solves problems, opens minds, and shapes future knowledge. Whether in art or science, creative work inspires generations and becomes a foundation for future growth.
80 words
The essay highlights the timeless nature of creativity by showing how poets like Shelley and scientists like Faraday left lasting legacies. Shelley’s poetic vision still speaks to readers, while Faraday’s scientific imagination laid the groundwork for modern technology. Creativity is shown as a force that transcends time—it is not tied to a moment but continues to grow and inspire. The author reminds us that true creativity in any field contributes to human progress, making it a permanent part of our shared intellectual journey.
---
20. What is the message of the essay “Patterns of Creativity”?
20 words
The essay says poetry and science are different but equally creative. Both are needed for a complete understanding of life.
40 words
The essay’s message is that creativity appears in different forms. Science uses logic, poetry uses emotion, but both seek truth. They shouldn’t fight or separate—they should support each other. Human progress depends on balancing facts with imagination and feeling.
60 words
“Patterns of Creativity” teaches that creativity exists in both science and poetry, though their styles differ. Science explores the outside world using logic, while poetry explores the inner world using imagination. The author wants readers to respect both fields and not see them as enemies. True growth, he argues, happens when intellect and emotion, fact and beauty, work together.
80 words
The main message of “Patterns of Creativity” is that both science and poetry are powerful, creative forces. They may follow different paths—science through reason, poetry through imagination—but they both aim to understand the world. The author uses examples from Shelley, Faraday, and Darwin to show how emotion and intellect must go hand in hand. He urges us to value both poetic and scientific creativity equally. Only then can we truly grow as humans—spiritually, emotionally, and intellectually.
🔍 At DAsKLiBrO, we believe that exam preparation should be smart, stress-free, and focused. That’s why we provide reliable NCERT solutions, chapter-wise insights, and exam-oriented guidance to help Class 11 students truly understand the subject—not just memorize it.
Whether it’s English, Chemistry, or any core subject, our resources are designed by experienced educators to:
Simplify complex topics
Strengthen concept clarity
Sharpen your answer-writing skills
Boost your confidence for board exams and beyond
Explore more chapters, test series, and study support only on www.dasklibro.com your trusted companion in academic success.
Google Sites
Report abuse